Academic Writing

Climate Change Policy and Its Economic Implications

Assignment Instructions on Climate Change Policy and Its Economic Implications Assignment 2 General Assessment Guidance This submission represents the complete assessed contribution for this module and should be approached as a sustained piece of analytical work rather than a routine academic exercise. The expected length for this assignment is 1,000–1,500 words, a range chosen to encourage depth without unnecessary expansion. Writing well below this range often limits analytical development, while exceeding it tends to dilute economic reasoning rather than strengthen it. All elements of the submission must be uploaded through Turnitin online access. Submissions shared via email, physical media, or hard copy fall outside the assessment system and will not be considered. Deadlines are fixed; late submissions are not eligible for marking regardless of circumstance. Anonymity is essential. Your work should display only your Student Reference Number (SRN). Including names or personal identifiers compromises assessment integrity and may result in administrative rejection. A total of 100 marks are available, with a minimum pass requirement of 50%. The Harvard Referencing System must be used consistently. Any use of published material that is not properly acknowledged will be treated as plagiarism. University regulations on plagiarism, collusion, and academic misconduct apply fully. AI-based tools may be used only for language review or draft refinement, not for generating ideas, arguments, or analysis. A completed Assignment Cover Sheet must accompany the submission. Missing documentation may invalidate the work before academic review begins. Assessment Brief Introduction This assessment requires a policy-focused academic report examining climate change policy and its economic implications within contemporary national and global contexts. Rather than treating climate change as a purely environmental concern, the report should engage with its economic dimensions, including fiscal trade-offs, market behavior, public investment, and distributional outcomes. You are expected to approach climate policy as a contested economic space shaped by political priorities, institutional capacity, and long-term risk management. The report should demonstrate how economic analysis helps explain both the opportunities and tensions created by mitigation and adaptation policies. The writing should reflect the perspective of an emerging policy analyst or economist, capable of weighing evidence, interpreting economic data, and engaging critically with policy debates. Learning Outcomes LO1 – Frame climate change policy as an issue of economic significance and strategic decision-making. LO2 – Examine policy complexity by evaluating economic trade-offs and stakeholder implications. LO3 – Apply appropriate economic theories and policy frameworks to real-world climate initiatives. LO4 – Develop analytically grounded insights that demonstrate economic reasoning rather than advocacy. Key Areas to Cover Executive Summary Introduction Challenge and issues faced by policymakers Purpose of the report Stakeholder analysis Evaluation and analysis using secondary data Recommendations and conclusion Your work should demonstrate economic literacy, familiarity with policy instruments, and an ability to connect theory with observed policy outcomes. Assertions must be supported by academic or institutional evidence rather than opinion-led commentary. Business Consultancy Report Structure Cover page with SRN • Title page • Table of contents • List of figures, tables, or abbreviations (if required) • Executive summary • Introduction • Challenge and issues faced by policymakers • Purpose of the report • Stakeholder analysis • Evaluation and analysis with secondary data • Recommendations and conclusion • Harvard references • Appendices (if required) The word count applies to the main body only. Front matter, references, and appendices are excluded from the total. Word Count Breakdown (Approximate) Executive Summary – 120 Introduction – 150 Challenge and issues – 250 Purpose of the report – 100 Stakeholder analysis – 200 Evaluation and analysis – 400 Recommendations and conclusion – 250 Total – approximately 1,470 words These figures serve as a planning guide rather than a rigid template. Analytical balance and clarity remain the priority. Executive Summary Guidelines The executive summary should be written once the report is complete. Its role is to provide a concise overview of the policy challenge, the economic issues explored, the nature of the secondary data consulted, and the key analytical insights that emerge. Stronger summaries communicate why the economic implications of climate policy matter in practical terms, such as public spending priorities, market incentives, or long-term growth considerations, rather than simply listing report sections. Section Guidelines Introduction Use this section to establish climate change policy as an economic issue. Briefly situate the discussion within current policy debates, such as carbon pricing, green subsidies, or climate-related financial risk. Indicate how the report develops its analysis without offering a roadmap-style outline. Challenge and Issues Faced by Policymakers This section should explore the economic challenges associated with climate policy design and implementation. Examples may include balancing short-term economic costs with long-term benefits, managing industry transition risks, or addressing inequality created by policy measures. Support discussion with recent economic evidence, policy reports, or empirical studies. Purpose of the Report Clarify the analytical purpose of the report. This may involve examining whether certain climate policies achieve economic efficiency, exploring unintended economic consequences, or assessing policy coherence across sectors. The purpose should reflect critical inquiry rather than policy endorsement. Stakeholder Analysis Identify key stakeholders affected by climate change policy, such as households, firms, governments, and financial institutions. Evaluate differences in power, interest, and economic exposure. Consider how costs and benefits are distributed across groups, drawing on economic concepts such as externalities, incentives, and equity. Evaluation and Analysis with Secondary Data Engage critically with secondary economic data, including government statistics, policy evaluations, or peer-reviewed studies. Apply relevant frameworks such as cost–benefit analysis, market failure theory, or public goods economics. Compare contrasting findings where possible and acknowledge methodological limitations. Recommendations and Conclusion Offer evidence-based recommendations grounded in your analysis rather than normative preference. These may relate to policy design, economic safeguards, or areas requiring further research. Conclude by reflecting on the broader economic significance of climate change policy and its implications for future decision-making. References and Presentation Harvard referencing must be applied accurately and consistently. A strong submission draws on a range of academic journals, policy reports, and reputable institutional sources. Presentation should reflect academic professionalism, with clear headings, logical flow, numbered … Read more

Translate »