Name: Academic Writing
Address: USA

Should the Use of Facial Recognition Be Restricted?

January 26, 2026 by Bela

Assignment 90 Instructions Argumentative Essay: Should the Use of Facial Recognition Be Restricted? This essay constitutes the complete summative assessment for this module, representing 100% of your grade. Students are expected to submit a 5,000–5,500 word argumentative essay evaluating the social, ethical, and technological dimensions of facial recognition systems and whether restrictions are warranted. All submissions must be made through Turnitin online access. Submissions via email, USB, or hard copy will not be accepted. Only your Student Reference Number (SRN) should appear on the submission to maintain anonymity. A completed Assignment Cover Sheet is mandatory. Failure to include this may result in invalidation of the submission. Harvard referencing must be applied consistently throughout your essay. Sources should include peer-reviewed journals, government and industry reports, case studies, and reputable news outlets. Any unreferenced material will be considered plagiarism. AI tools may only be used for structural suggestions, grammar corrections, and language enhancement. Analytical reasoning, synthesis of evidence, and argument development must remain entirely your original work. Analytical Scope The essay explores whether facial recognition technology (FRT) poses threats to privacy, civil liberties, and social equity, or whether its benefits, such as enhanced security and efficiency, justify its use. Students should consider: Privacy and ethical concerns associated with mass surveillance Bias and accuracy issues, particularly concerning racial and gender profiling Legal and regulatory frameworks at local, national, and international levels Technological advancements that influence adoption and reliability Societal and economic implications, including workplace monitoring and law enforcement Your arguments should integrate empirical research, ethical theory, and policy analysis to create a nuanced evaluation. Learning Outcomes By completing this essay, students will be able to: Construct well-reasoned, evidence-based arguments regarding the ethical and practical dimensions of emerging technologies Assess both benefits and risks of facial recognition in societal, institutional, and personal contexts Synthesize quantitative and qualitative evidence in support of argumentation Explore ethical, legal, and social implications of surveillance technologies Formulate actionable recommendations for policy, regulation, and individual practice Essay Organization Avoid using a conventional introduction–body–conclusion structure. Instead, organize content thematically and progressively, highlighting multiple perspectives, counterarguments, and evidence-based reasoning. Preliminary Pages Include: Declaration of Originality Title Page Table of Contents List of Figures, Tables, and Abbreviations (if applicable) These pages do not count toward the word total but ensure professional formatting and readability. Executive Summary Your executive summary (~500 words) should be written after completing the essay. It must succinctly outline: The central thesis regarding whether facial recognition should be restricted Key supporting and opposing arguments Evidence synthesis and evaluation of counterpoints Practical recommendations for policy, institutions, and citizens This serves as a concise overview for readers, emphasizing clarity and strategic insights. Contextual Background Technological Development and Adoption Explore the history and evolution of facial recognition systems, including AI and machine learning integration Examine widespread applications: law enforcement, retail, border control, and personal device security Discuss technological limitations, including false positives, dataset bias, and algorithmic opacity Legal and Policy Landscape Examine regulatory approaches in the US and internationally, including GDPR, CCPA, and local ordinances Discuss cases and legislation that have limited or banned certain FRT applications Explore tensions between public safety objectives and individual rights Societal and Ethical Implications Evaluate privacy risks, civil liberties concerns, and public perceptions Discuss disproportionate impact on marginalized populations Consider ethical frameworks such as utilitarianism, deontology, and rights-based perspectives Arguments Supporting Restricted Use Privacy and Civil Liberties Examine surveillance implications for individuals in public and private spaces Discuss risks of continuous monitoring, data collection, and potential misuse Algorithmic Bias and Accuracy Concerns Highlight studies showing higher error rates for women, Black, and Latinx individuals Analyze potential consequences for criminal justice, hiring practices, and social equity Societal and Psychological Impacts Consider chilling effects on freedom of expression, protest, and public assembly Explore mental health and social trust consequences of pervasive surveillance Arguments Against Restriction Public Safety and Security Benefits Explore FRT applications in law enforcement, missing persons cases, and disaster response Highlight efficiency gains, real-time threat detection, and potential crime reduction Technological Advancements and Accuracy Improvements Examine AI developments that enhance accuracy and reduce bias Discuss potential for oversight mechanisms, audits, and transparent algorithm design Economic and Operational Efficiency Explore benefits to businesses, transportation hubs, and healthcare institutions Discuss cost savings and efficiency in identity verification and fraud prevention Counterarguments and Critical Evaluation Integrate perspectives from civil society, tech developers, and policy experts Discuss trade-offs between security, privacy, and equity Critically evaluate empirical evidence supporting both restriction and liberal deployment of FRT Highlight gaps in research, emerging trends, and potential unintended consequences Evidence-Based Analysis Quantitative Evidence Include longitudinal studies, error rate analyses, and adoption statistics Compare deployment contexts with and without oversight measures Evaluate statistical reliability and limitations of datasets Qualitative Evidence Incorporate case studies, expert interviews, and ethnographic accounts Discuss societal narratives and public sentiment surrounding FRT Analyze ethical dilemmas documented in real-world deployments Recommendations and Implications Propose actionable recommendations for lawmakers, regulators, and organizational leaders Suggest balanced approaches: partial bans, strict oversight, transparency measures, and public engagement Discuss strategies to reduce bias, protect privacy, and maintain social trust Explore implications for future technology governance and civic engagement Reflective Considerations Examine the long-term societal and ethical consequences of unrestricted FRT use Discuss the evolving role of AI, predictive analytics, and biometric technologies in governance Highlight the importance of interdisciplinary research, policy innovation, and civic literacy in shaping technological futures Word Count Allocation To effectively meet the 5,000–5,500 word requirement: Executive Summary: ~500 words summarizing thesis, evidence, counterpoints, and recommendations Contextual Background: ~1,000–1,200 words covering history, legal frameworks, and societal implications Arguments Supporting Restriction: ~1,000–1,200 words analyzing privacy, bias, and societal risks Arguments Against Restriction: ~1,000–1,200 words on security benefits, technological improvements, and operational efficiency Counterarguments and Critical Evaluation: ~600–700 words assessing nuanced perspectives and limitations of research Evidence-Based Analysis: ~800–900 words synthesizing quantitative and qualitative findings Recommendations and Reflective Considerations: ~400–500 words linking findings to actionable guidance and long-term implications This ensures balanced exploration of ethical, legal, and technological dimensions while maintaining academic rigor. Presentation and … Read more

Role of Technology in Changing Human Communication Patterns

January 19, 2026 by Bela

Assignment 65 Instructions for Essay Writing on The Role of Technology in Changing Human Communication Patterns General Assessment Guidance This essay on Technology Changing Human Communication constitutes 100% of your module marks and must be 5,000 to 5,500 words in length. Submissions outside this word range will not be accepted; under the minimum is allowed, but aim for thorough coverage. Only submissions via Turnitin are valid. Email, hard copy, or pen drive submissions will not be considered. Include only your Student Reference Number (SRN); do not include personal identifying information. Total marks: 100; minimum pass mark: 50%. Use the Harvard Referencing System consistently. Any unreferenced material will be considered plagiarism. AI assistance is permitted only for proofreading or language refinement, not for content generation. A completed Assignment Cover Sheet is required; omissions may invalidate your submission. Assessment Brief Framing the Investigation This essay (Technology Changing Human Communication) requires an in-depth analysis of how digital technology, social media, and communication platforms are reshaping human interaction. You will explore both positive and negative shifts in communication styles, interpersonal dynamics, and societal expectations. Your analysis should draw on scholarly research, industry reports, and practical case examples, emphasizing how technology modifies relationships, cognition, and cultural communication norms. Focus on evidence-supported insights rather than opinion, linking technological innovations to measurable changes in human communication patterns across different contexts. Learning Outcomes LO1 – Examine the multifaceted impact of digital communication technologies on human interaction. LO2 – Critically evaluate trends, opportunities, and challenges in mediated communication. LO3 – Produce a scholarly essay integrating theory, empirical evidence, and case studies. LO4 – Recommend strategies for effective, responsible, and adaptive communication in technology-rich environments. Key Areas to Explore Synthesis of Current Findings Theoretical Frameworks for Communication in Digital Contexts Drivers of Transformation in Communication Patterns Consequences for Individuals, Communities, and Organizations Evaluation Using Secondary Data Strategic Recommendations and Future Directions Your submission must demonstrate an understanding of media effects theory, social presence theory, digital literacy, and the psychology of online interactions, drawing connections between empirical data and human behavioral outcomes. Essay Structure Guidelines Declaration Page Title Page Table of Contents List of Figures/Tables/Abbreviations (if relevant) Synthesis of Current Findings Theoretical Frameworks for Communication in Digital Contexts Drivers of Transformation in Communication Patterns Consequences for Individuals, Communities, and Organizations Evaluation Using Secondary Data Strategic Recommendations and Future Directions Harvard References Appendices (if required) Total length: 5,000 to 5,500 words (excluding front matter, references, appendices). Word Count Breakdown (Approximate) Synthesis of Current Findings – 500 Theoretical Frameworks – 300 Drivers of Transformation – 600 Consequences for Individuals & Communities – 600 Evaluation Using Secondary Data – 2,000 Strategic Recommendations – 1,000 Total – 5,000 Synthesis of Current Findings Guidelines Approximately 500 words, summarizing key research on digital communication trends. Highlight major shifts in interpersonal and organizational communication due to technology. Distinguish between positive innovations (e.g., accessibility, immediacy) and negative consequences (e.g., attention fragmentation, miscommunication). Section Guidelines Theoretical Frameworks for Communication in Digital Contexts Define communication theories applicable to digital environments (e.g., social presence theory, media richness theory, or networked individualism). Explain how these frameworks help interpret changes in human interaction. Include practical examples from workplaces, education, and social media ecosystems. Drivers of Transformation in Communication Patterns Examine technological drivers: mobile devices, social platforms, AI communication tools. Explore societal factors: globalization, remote work culture, shifting social norms. Highlight how generational differences influence adaptation to new communication technologies. Consequences for Individuals, Communities, and Organizations Investigate impacts on mental health, professional productivity, interpersonal relationships, and cultural expression. Explore organizational consequences: collaboration efficiency, knowledge sharing, and leadership communication challenges. Incorporate case studies and cross-sector comparisons to illustrate real-world implications. Evaluation Using Secondary Data Critically analyse academic research, surveys, market reports, and communication studies. Compare findings across contexts, highlighting consistency or divergence. Discuss methodological limitations and factors influencing interpretation. Strategic Recommendations and Future Directions Suggest actionable strategies for individuals: digital etiquette, boundary management, and adaptive communication skills. Recommend organizational interventions: policies for effective digital communication, employee training, and technology governance. Consider future trends and emerging technologies, linking recommendations to sustainable, evidence-based practice. References and Presentation Follow Harvard referencing consistently. Include scholarly journals, reputable industry reports, and authoritative online sources. Ensure professional presentation: numbered pages, clearly labeled tables/figures, consistent headings, and polished formatting. Write with clarity and depth while maintaining a coherent, scholarly tone without repetition. This assignment essay on technology changing human communication emphasizes critical synthesis, analytical rigor, and evidence-based recommendations, requiring students to connect technological trends to real-world communication dynamics while offering insight into both individual and societal implications.